U.S. Department of Transportation
Federal Highway Administration
1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE
Washington, DC 20590
202-366-4000


Skip to content
Facebook iconYouTube iconTwitter iconFlickr iconLinkedInInstagram

Safety

FHWA Home / Safety / SHSP / Strategic Highway Safety Plan Evaluation Process Model – How to use this CD

header

Strategic Highway Safety Plan Evaluation Process Model Worksheet – Chapter 3

Performance Evaluation – Outputs and Outcomes

Column Descriptions

As evidenced by: What is the evidence for the yes (or the no) answer?

What is the Impact: What impact, positive or negative, is this having on our SHSP process?

Opportunities: How can we improve our efforts with respect to this question?

Action Items: What steps will we take to improve our process, when should the steps be completed, and who is responsible for completing them?

Performance evaluation is comprised of: output evaluation and outcome evaluation. For each of these areas the primary question driving the evaluation is:

What will it take to convince us our programs/
strategies/actions/investments are getting us where we need to be?

The questions below will help determine the effectiveness of current performance evaluation efforts and identify areas for improvement. The EPM is based on noteworthy practices and current research and is general in nature. States should feel free to add to and/or modify these questions to fit their particular situation.

Performance Evaluation Questions

Yes/No

As evidenced by (observations)

What is the impact
(positive or negative)?

Opportunities

Action Items

1. Has the current status of all output and outcome performance measures been gathered and reviewed?

empty cell

empty cell

empty cell

empty cell

empty cell

2. Are the performance measures clearly related to SHSP goals and objectives?

empty cell

empty cell

empty cell

empty cell

empty cell

3. Are the numbers and rates of fatalities and serious injuries used as general statistical measures?

empty cell

empty cell

empty cell

empty cell

empty cell

4. Are the numbers and rates of fatalities and serious injuries tracked and reported by emphasis area and compared to previously set objectives?

empty cell

empty cell

empty cell

empty cell

empty cell

5. Have fatality and serious injury objectives been met?

empty cell

empty cell

empty cell

empty cell

empty cell

6. Are observation and/or telephone survey data collected and analyzed to track changes in awareness, attitudes, and behaviors?

empty cell

empty cell

empty cell

empty cell

empty cell

7. Have awareness, attitude, and behavior objectives been met?

empty cell

empty cell

empty cell

empty cell

empty cell

8. Are program-level benefit/cost analyses conducted on certain SHSP programs?

empty cell

empty cell

empty cell

empty cell

empty cell

9. Have the benefits of the program(s) outweighed the costs?

empty cell

empty cell

empty cell

empty cell

empty cell

Action Item Summary

SHSP Organizational Structure – Action Items

Deadline

Responsible Person

1.

empty cell

empty cell

2.

empty cell

empty cell

3.

empty cell

empty cell

4.

empty cell

empty cell

5.

empty cell

empty cell

6.

empty cell

empty cell

Page last modified on April 17, 2014
Safe Roads for a Safer Future - Investment in roadway safety saves lives
Federal Highway Administration | 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE | Washington, DC 20590 | 202-366-4000